Legislation to Prohibit Arbitration Clauses from Denying Employees Their Day in Court

US-Senate-BuildingForced arbitration is a powerful tool used by employers to limit employees from suing them in court. Under the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”), employers have wide latitude to force employees into mandatory arbitration. Arbitration is a binding process that is conducted by a private judge (arbitrator),  instead of a public trial. Arbitration can have many disadvantages to employees as compared to court, including:

  • Shortened hearings with no formal rules of evidence
  • Very limited ability to obtain documents and information from the employer before the hearing
  • Not public
  • Extremely limited appeal rights

Because employers often condition employment offers on signing an arbitration agreement, employees often do not truly have a choice whether to sign away their right to go to court should they decide sue their employer. The FAA has been broadly interpreted and reinforced by the United States Supreme Court in the past few decades, effectively denying employees their constitutional right to have their case heard in court.[1]

To combat forced arbitration the U.S. House of Representatives passed the Fair Arbitration Injustice Repeal (“FAIR” Act) in 2019. The FAIR Act would repeal the FAA, finally allowing employees to have their day in court. But the FAIR Act was never brought to the floor in the Republican-controlled Senate, and therefore didn’t become law.

On February 11, 2021, the FAIR Act was re-introduced to the House of Representatives (H.R. 963) by Representative Hank Johnson (D-GA). The FAIR Act is expected to pass the House again this year. Since Democrats now (narrowly) control the Senate, the FAIR Act is likely to make it out of committee in the Senate, and go to a full floor vote.

However, it is unclear whether the FAIR Act will garner enough Republican support in the Senate to overcome the filibuster, which remains in place, though the prohibition of forced arbitration in employment matters has received bipartisan support in the past.[2]

If you support ending forced arbitration, please contact your elected representative and encourage them to vote yes on the FAIR Act (H.R. 963): https://www.usa.gov/elected-officials.

Halunen Law supports the rights of employees to have full and free access to the court system. If you are subject to a forced arbitration agreement and feel you are being treated illegally in the workplace, the experienced employment law attorneys at Halunen Law are here to help. Contact us today for a free consultation.

[1] https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/seventh_amendment

[2] https://endforcedarbitration.medium.com/the-bipartisan-case-for-ending-forced-arbitration-485f73eeb635

Other Recent Posts

Justice
Halunen Law Attorney Paul Schinner Quoted in Pioneer Press on Recent Settlement

06/11/2026

Paul Schinner, attorney at Halunen Law, was quoted by Pioneer Press in an article outlining ...

Read More →
concerned employee looking at the computer
What Potential Whistleblowers Should Know Before Exposing an Employer’s Illegal Conduct

06/10/2026

“We’re all familiar with that ubiquitous mantra, “If you see something, say something.” We usually ...

Read More →
Justice
Halunen Law attorneys are recognized in Minnesota Lawyer Legal 250 list

05/21/2026

Minnesota Lawyer has selected Halunen Law employment attorney Josh Newville and of-counsel attorney Pamela Johnson ...

Read More →

All Posts

Explore all resources for trusted insights from the attorneys at Halunen Law.

EXPLORE ALL POSTS

Results That Make a Difference.

Our Practice Areas

LEARN MORE
© 2026 Halunen Law | Minneapolis Employment Attorneys